<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holga Vs Diana+ Shoot Out!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.holgablog.com/2009/07/15/holga-vs-diana-shoot-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.holgablog.com/2009/07/15/holga-vs-diana-shoot-out/</link>
	<description>A blog for all things Holga (and other photo stuff!)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:46:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurasu</title>
		<link>http://www.holgablog.com/2009/07/15/holga-vs-diana-shoot-out/comment-page-1/#comment-2232</link>
		<dc:creator>laurasu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holgablog.com/?p=1184#comment-2232</guid>
		<description>unfortunately, I can&#039;T visit the side with the whole set, so I still don&#039;t know which one is which...can anyone tell me please because this way (without the result) the whole shoot-out-thing doesn&#039;t pay off for me!
cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unfortunately, I can&#8217;T visit the side with the whole set, so I still don&#8217;t know which one is which&#8230;can anyone tell me please because this way (without the result) the whole shoot-out-thing doesn&#8217;t pay off for me!<br />
cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: Holga vs. Diana+ &#171; Holga Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.holgablog.com/2009/07/15/holga-vs-diana-shoot-out/comment-page-1/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: Holga vs. Diana+ &#171; Holga Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 23:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holgablog.com/?p=1184#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>[...] difference at a glimpse. More sophisticated shootout of Holga vs. Diana+ was very recently covered here at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] difference at a glimpse. More sophisticated shootout of Holga vs. Diana+ was very recently covered here at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana+ VS Holga. Round One &#171; Holga Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.holgablog.com/2009/07/15/holga-vs-diana-shoot-out/comment-page-1/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana+ VS Holga. Round One &#171; Holga Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holgablog.com/?p=1184#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>[...] Eventually I will be doing a heads up shoot out between the Diana+ and the Holga. We’ll call that Round Two. The purpose is will not be to prove once and for all which camera is better; it&#8217;s only to serve as an objective means for comparison for someone that may be getting ready to take the plunge and invest in one of these camera&#8217;s. I plan to accomplish this by shooting 2 rolls of film from the same batch, shooting the same subject from a tri-pod. There are so many variables that exist that to do a scientific comparison under all conditions would be pretty expensive. I don&#8217;t have time to write grants for this type of research so you&#8217;ll have to just accept whatever it is I decide to shoot and at which time of day. I can promise that the shots will be taken within a couple of minutes each other for continuity. If you don&#8217;t like it do your own Diana+ Vs Holga shootout. One thing I will say is that the quality of image you get has more to do with your artistic vision and your understanding of lighting, exposure and composition. Sure happy accidents exist and some people love purely abstract photos, but ultimately someone with a better understanding of these principles will get more consistent results. The fun factor is that many toy camera users aren’t looking for consistency, they’re just having fun shooting film through a fun camera. To view the follow up with pictures of this comparison please go here: http://www.holgablog.com/2009/07/15/holga-vs-diana-shoot-out/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eventually I will be doing a heads up shoot out between the Diana+ and the Holga. We’ll call that Round Two. The purpose is will not be to prove once and for all which camera is better; it&#8217;s only to serve as an objective means for comparison for someone that may be getting ready to take the plunge and invest in one of these camera&#8217;s. I plan to accomplish this by shooting 2 rolls of film from the same batch, shooting the same subject from a tri-pod. There are so many variables that exist that to do a scientific comparison under all conditions would be pretty expensive. I don&#8217;t have time to write grants for this type of research so you&#8217;ll have to just accept whatever it is I decide to shoot and at which time of day. I can promise that the shots will be taken within a couple of minutes each other for continuity. If you don&#8217;t like it do your own Diana+ Vs Holga shootout. One thing I will say is that the quality of image you get has more to do with your artistic vision and your understanding of lighting, exposure and composition. Sure happy accidents exist and some people love purely abstract photos, but ultimately someone with a better understanding of these principles will get more consistent results. The fun factor is that many toy camera users aren’t looking for consistency, they’re just having fun shooting film through a fun camera. To view the follow up with pictures of this comparison please go here: <a href="http://www.holgablog.com/2009/07/15/holga-vs-diana-shoot-out/" rel="nofollow">http://www.holgablog.com/2009/07/15/holga-vs-diana-shoot-out/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skies of Bitan</title>
		<link>http://www.holgablog.com/2009/07/15/holga-vs-diana-shoot-out/comment-page-1/#comment-1464</link>
		<dc:creator>Skies of Bitan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holgablog.com/?p=1184#comment-1464</guid>
		<description>Nice simple comparison. The only reason I decided to try the Diana F+ was to experiment with pinhole photography since it&#039;s so easy to remove the lens and play with the F/150 pinhole. Loading film on the Diana is precarious and film winding is very inconsistent. Really poor design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice simple comparison. The only reason I decided to try the Diana F+ was to experiment with pinhole photography since it&#8217;s so easy to remove the lens and play with the F/150 pinhole. Loading film on the Diana is precarious and film winding is very inconsistent. Really poor design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy dubs</title>
		<link>http://www.holgablog.com/2009/07/15/holga-vs-diana-shoot-out/comment-page-1/#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy dubs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holgablog.com/?p=1184#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>This is a great site, i just came across a couple of Toy cameras and am purchasing a Holga. Thanks for making the Manual available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great site, i just came across a couple of Toy cameras and am purchasing a Holga. Thanks for making the Manual available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jevyn Nelms</title>
		<link>http://www.holgablog.com/2009/07/15/holga-vs-diana-shoot-out/comment-page-1/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>Jevyn Nelms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holgablog.com/?p=1184#comment-920</guid>
		<description>Brilliant comparison.  I&#039;ve been searching for this.  I guessed !00% correct; guess &#039;cause I LOVE my DianaF+ and the artistic effects, which i think are more pronounced than w/ the Holga.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant comparison.  I&#8217;ve been searching for this.  I guessed !00% correct; guess &#8217;cause I LOVE my DianaF+ and the artistic effects, which i think are more pronounced than w/ the Holga.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photobroxbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.holgablog.com/2009/07/15/holga-vs-diana-shoot-out/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>photobroxbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holgablog.com/?p=1184#comment-915</guid>
		<description>interesting that the Holga seems to give the imagers more of a magenta caste.  I am a Holga fan.  Have thought about buying the Diana but it doesn&#039;t seem to do anything the Holga can&#039;t do.  And the Holga is cheaper and more robust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting that the Holga seems to give the imagers more of a magenta caste.  I am a Holga fan.  Have thought about buying the Diana but it doesn&#8217;t seem to do anything the Holga can&#8217;t do.  And the Holga is cheaper and more robust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Von Evil</title>
		<link>http://www.holgablog.com/2009/07/15/holga-vs-diana-shoot-out/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Von Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holgablog.com/?p=1184#comment-799</guid>
		<description>Jonas, thanks for reconizing my goos points :)  They sell a 35mm back for the Diana so I would be surprised if they come out with a 35mm version like the Holga 135.  The 75mm lens would be a telephoto on 135 negatives :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonas, thanks for reconizing my goos points <img src='http://www.holgablog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   They sell a 35mm back for the Diana so I would be surprised if they come out with a 35mm version like the Holga 135.  The 75mm lens would be a telephoto on 135 negatives <img src='http://www.holgablog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

