Review: Kershaw Penguin Folding Camera

May I present to you the 6×9 Kershaw Eight-Twenty Penguin. Released in the 50’s and made in Britain, it was crap even back then. One shutter speed (or bulb), and a choice of two apertures, plus some dodgy manufacturing didn’t leave me feeling confident of getting decent photos. On the plus side, the bellows were in good nick with no light leaking, but the lens did have some fungus :-( Oh, and the shutter didn’t really work (it worked in bulb mode, but acted like it was in normal mode, if you pulled the shutter button out then pushed it back in!). And the the viewfinder was completed loose and wobbly. And the metal struts that held the lens in place were stuck. And the aperture selection switch pretty much didn’t slide.

But apart from that it was fine.

The penguin closed. it looks almost sleek!

I love experimenting with old cameras, I buy a few here and there, and always use them. It’s such a waste to think people buy old cameras just to collect them without ever firing the shutter. I was determined to see if I could get anything out of it.

A perfect opportunity arose, we were heading up Ben A’an for a brisk walk, and with such great views of Loch Katrine and further afield, I figured a 6×9 would be perfect! Just to be safe I did end up taking a holga and a polaroid though!
After scaling the mountain, i pulled out the Penguin, folded it out and starting taking photos. The problem was, however, the metal bracing on that held the lens in place was stuck, so the first 4 photos were completely out of focus due to a wonky bellow! After correcting it with some force, I continued taking photos until i realised you only get 8 on the film(damn my below-par mathematical skills!).

The viewfinder(top right) was pretty much useless. The shutter release button (the cylindrical bit on left) only worked when you pulled it up first(and when it was on B), and the aperture was a bit sticky. Leica this was not.

I developed them and a few things were apparent: The shutter is waaaaay slower than the 1/100 I had read on the internet. With 400ISO film, they were incredibly overexposed(it was a stinkingly dark day too, so 400 film was the right one to use), I had to turn the levels right down in photoshop to see the photo :-( Next time I’ll use some 100ISO film and I should be sorted (if there is a next time!). The other thing is that there is an obscene amount of dust on the inside of the lens, but as I don’t have a working bulb mode to clean the inside of the lens, it’s stuck there forever.

Here’s the photos anyway, I guess they really do look like they have been taken with a 60 year old camera!

And just for comparison, the polaroid:
Loch Katrine

Overall, I would say there are better folding cameras out there to try, most of them are incredibly cheap at the moment too, so get digging (check out our recent article on the Zeiss Ikon).  I wouldn’t bother with the Penguin, it’s pretty rubbish!  Maybe if it’s a couple of dollars, but otherwise leave well alone.

Anyone else tried some crap old cameras in the hope of getting something good out of them?  Sometimes you find some real gems, other times you get the Kershaw Penguin.

Comments

  1. Posted by dave on August 9th, 2009, 17:59 (Reply to this comment)

    A few drops of lighter fluid is often all it takes to free up the mechanisms on old cameras, I’ve saved a couple that way.

  2. Posted by Andrew(Admin) on August 9th, 2009, 18:05 (Reply to this comment)

    to be honest dave, I was thinking about a whole tin of lighter fluid, and a naked flame to fix the camera ;-)

    I think it’s called camera-euthanasia. I can almost hear the poor thing whimper ‘kill me’ every time the shutter is released!

  3. Posted by Derek on August 12th, 2009, 23:35 (Reply to this comment)

    Great read.

  4. Posted by Patrick on August 19th, 2009, 22:19 (Reply to this comment)

    I have 2 of those exact types of cameras, ones a Rollex(or something)-kind of in beat up condition and then I also have the generic version thats called Follex (again not sure if im spelling this exactly right there at home) Anyways both of them were very dissapointing, probably will never use them again!

  5. Posted by Patrick Delaney on December 8th, 2009, 21:26 (Reply to this comment)

    I was sent one of these for my 14th birthday in 1947. I knew absolutely nothing about photography and I used it happily until 1961. I have some surprisingly good photos with it, given that it was just a schoolboy’s camera!

    • Posted by Andrew(Admin) on December 8th, 2009, 22:03 (Reply to this comment)

      Patrick, do you still have yours? If not, you are very welcome to have mine for free!

      • Posted by Patrick Delaney on August 17th, 2010, 22:37 (Reply to this comment)

        I’ve only just looked at this site again and seen your reply and thank you very much for your offer. Yes, I do have my old Kershaw camera, but have not used it since 1961 – just keep it for sentimental reasons.

Reply

A few commenting guidelines:
Please stay on-topic
Do not insult people
Some HTML tags are allowed

Recommended Articles

Holgapalooza 2010 Deadline Approaches!

The deadline for www.holgapalooza.com is just around the corner! Here is a reminder of this year’s Summer Contest Festivus!

Fun in the Sun-Printing

Some time late last year (OK, Christmas), I got a present called “Sun-Print Paper”. This stuff is basically sold as a “toy” to parents who probably want their kids to get off their console, get out the house, and take in some Sunshine or else.

How to make Cog-Pano’s on your Holga

First things first. The image above was shot on my Holga, and I only manipulated digitally by way of turning it black & white and adding my copyright symbol. Otherwise, this is shown exactly as it was shot, with the image stretching its way across the film plain in a nice wide panoramic and covering [...]